<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open standards &#8211; the future of mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conversations.nokia.com/2008/04/23/open-standards-the-future-of-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conversations.nokia.com/2008/04/23/open-standards-the-future-of-mobile/</link>
	<description>Stories from around the Nokia neighbourhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tommi Vilkamo</title>
		<link>http://conversations.nokia.com/2008/04/23/open-standards-the-future-of-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommi Vilkamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversations.nokia.com/?p=92#comment-153</guid>
		<description>While I love open standards, interoperability and single-platform-across vendors as much as the next guy, this is the story that everybody has been telling  for the last 10 years or so.

I would love to have a public conversation about which part of these visions has materialized already, which is currently happening, and which part is likely never to happen. And why. Where we were right, and where we were wrong. What have we learned, and which mistakes are likely to repeat themselves - if we are not careful.

Would you happen to have a good story to initiate this conversation? :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I love open standards, interoperability and single-platform-across vendors as much as the next guy, this is the story that everybody has been telling  for the last 10 years or so.</p>
<p>I would love to have a public conversation about which part of these visions has materialized already, which is currently happening, and which part is likely never to happen. And why. Where we were right, and where we were wrong. What have we learned, and which mistakes are likely to repeat themselves &#8211; if we are not careful.</p>
<p>Would you happen to have a good story to initiate this conversation? <img src='http://conversations.nokia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine of MMM/Brighthand</title>
		<link>http://conversations.nokia.com/2008/04/23/open-standards-the-future-of-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine of MMM/Brighthand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversations.nokia.com/?p=92#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Open standards are a good thing, as long as they are easily adaptable by both developer and manufacturer, and easily understandable in their applications by the previous groups and the attending consumers.

For example, what Yahoo just announced that it is doing across all of its properties in terms of uniting the data using semantic web elements. This is good, as it makes a lower barrier to entry for competing services, but also gives consumers options towards how they want to use that information. While hardware is a bit less versatile, having open standards can promote the same kind of workings.

Open source is a slightly different matter. Personally, I think it should be commnuity driven, but big company funded in some endeavors. For example, what Nokia is doing with Maemo is a good thing for the industry, and a solid model to follow for some applications of mobile. As open source developers and communities become a bit less new at this, I would expect to see better relationships and products that come as a result of a shared vision (in some areas) and freedom to innovate (in all areas).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open standards are a good thing, as long as they are easily adaptable by both developer and manufacturer, and easily understandable in their applications by the previous groups and the attending consumers.</p>
<p>For example, what Yahoo just announced that it is doing across all of its properties in terms of uniting the data using semantic web elements. This is good, as it makes a lower barrier to entry for competing services, but also gives consumers options towards how they want to use that information. While hardware is a bit less versatile, having open standards can promote the same kind of workings.</p>
<p>Open source is a slightly different matter. Personally, I think it should be commnuity driven, but big company funded in some endeavors. For example, what Nokia is doing with Maemo is a good thing for the industry, and a solid model to follow for some applications of mobile. As open source developers and communities become a bit less new at this, I would expect to see better relationships and products that come as a result of a shared vision (in some areas) and freedom to innovate (in all areas).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoneBoy</title>
		<link>http://conversations.nokia.com/2008/04/23/open-standards-the-future-of-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversations.nokia.com/?p=92#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Open standards--and open source--are a driving force on the desktop space. Why would we expect mobile phones to be any different in this regard?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open standards&#8211;and open source&#8211;are a driving force on the desktop space. Why would we expect mobile phones to be any different in this regard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
