Circuit training: The amazing evolution of smartphone processors

Imagine. You hold more computing power in your hand than was used to put a man on the moon.

Published by Joel Willans on September 19, 2012

You’ve probably heard of Moore’s Law, the prediction made by Gordon E. Moore, the co-founder of Intel. In 1965, he said that the number of transistors on integrated circuits would double every two years. He expected this to be the case for just ten years, but it’s still happening. This astounding progression of computing power is no better demonstrated than by your smartphone’s processor. To see how much things have changed, let’s take a trip down memory lane.   

1996 – In the beginning

It’s 1996. Ebay launches the world’s first online auction site. The Spice Girls get their first number one with Wannabe and the movie Independence Day hits the big screen. Meanwhile, in Finland, Nokia launch the world’s first smartphone, the Nokia 9000 Communicator. Weighing in at a sturdy 397 g, the first ever Communicator was driven by an Intel 24 MHz i386 CPU. 

Running on the GEOS 3.0 operating system, it had a mere 8 MB of memory: Half of which was used for apps, 2 MB for program memory and 2 MB for user data. While these specs might not sound very impressive, in its day the Nokia 9000 Communicator was the best a man (or woman) could get. This is probably why it was used by Val Kilmer when he played Simon Templar in the 1997 remake of The Saint.

2007 – Touchtastic

While smartphone processing power continued to scale at unprecedented speeds, it wasn’t until 2007 that touch screen smartphones and the emergence of a big screen really pushed developers and component makers to keep pace with this ramp up. Typically these power hungry machines needed a 620 MHz CPU and used 128 MB of memory.

2008 – SoC it to them

With smartphones becoming increasingly sophisticated, the need for more computing power in a smaller space became paramount. Fortunately, human ingenuity delivered in 2008 when Qualcomm delivered the first System on a Chip (SoC) processors for mobile devices.

In a traditional desktop PC, the CPU, RAM, graphics card and storage are scattered pieces on a motherboard. Inside a smartphone, most of the space is taken up by the battery, and the notion of spreading functionality between different chips would cause severe space constraints and bring battery life to its knees. To overcome these challenges, engineers, like those from Qualcomm, put all the necessary components—CPU, GPU, memory, and wireless radio technologies—on a single chip.

2012 – Snappier than ever

Which bring us to today. You probably expect the world’s most innovative smartphone to have the world’s most innovative processor. Well, you’d be right. The Nokia Lumia 920 and its sibling the Lumia 820 both contain Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon S4 processors. At 28nm, the Snapdragon S4 takes die-shrinking to a new level, balancing performance and power efficiency like no other chip. Dual Core and clocked at 1.5GHz, the Snapdragon S4 processor makes smartphones faster and more versatile, too.

What’s more, within the Snapdragon S4 processor, you’ll find an Adreno 225 GPU. This graphics component enables the Nokia Lumia 920 and 820 to play the latest DirectX 3D games, drive HD content and support 720 p high resolution displays. Combined, this means the Nokia Lumia 920 is hundreds of times faster and has one hundred and twenty five times more memory than the original Nokia 9000 Communicator.

This incredible evolution of processors like Qualcomm’s Snapdragon shows this trend is set to continue. But how amazing can smartphones get? Let us know your predictions below.

Comments

  • http://www.freenclearstuff.com/ Amber Taylor

    Smart phones are becoming less “phone” like and more like handheld computers that make phone calls.

    • Lovrena

      Smartphones nowadays becoming far too big, and there are no choices.

      1996: Nokia 9000 Communicator (397 g)
      2002: Nokia 7650 (154 g)
      2011: Nokia 700 (96 g)
      2012: Lumia 920 (185 g)

      Will we see compact AND powerful smartphones again?

      • http://www.facebook.com/renocreativemanagement C Christian Andersen

        Great story. I remember my first cell phone. Hated carrying it because it was more like a piece of luggage. Now I never leave the house without my phone.

        • http://twitter.com/dalydose Jeff Daly

          Ha ha ha…I had a bag phone too! I remember when the “Saved By The Bell” Motorola came out and people thought it was soooo small.

      • http://twitter.com/dalydose Jeff Daly

        Only if:
        1. Battery innovation happens. People want these power houses to last all day and batteries are heavy.
        2. The market stops craving larger screens. I don’t see this happening in the short run. I think I’ll like the size of the 920. It might save me money on a tablet if I can read a book on it.

        • Lovrena

          Well, I have not so much problem with large phones. But for example my sis is not really a fond of it, and I can read similar feedbacks from other forums as well. Currently there are only low-end stuffs (they are also not really thin, though) and high-end giants.The only high-end middle sized gadget is from Apple. I think a compact but high-end looking gadget from Nokia would be a killer.

        • Lovrena

          1.) Smaller screen needs less power too. Compared to Lumia 920: a 3,5″ WVGA screen needs 40% less backlit and 2,5 times less GPU performance while providing stunning 266 ppi resolution. 4″ WVGA panel fits quite well for many.
          2) Just read the forums: there’s strong demand for smaller and powerful gadgets, but there’s no much offers out there. Hope to see a Lumia 720 or 620 with 4″ or even 3,7″ panel, exchangeable shells and compact design.

      • Terry

        Exactly! HTC has woken up to the fact that its phones are too big, why is Nokia so out of touch making a slab like the Lumia 920? Give me a 4″ screen anytime similar to the Lumia 800 would be perfect.

  • http://twitter.com/haroldlgardner Harold Gardner

    My first computer job was running a DEC VAX computer. We were excited to get it upgraded to a meg of RAM.

  • http://www.facebook.com/simone.giovagnorio Simone Giovagnorio

    Camputers.
    That’s what they are going to be!
    No we are not in a post-pc era, we’re just in an audio/visual-computing Era.

  • http://twitter.com/Articles_4u Alexander BK

    That was a great story! Thank you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=505882175 Rachael Kelly

    I agree with most that smart phones are becoming less of a “phone” and more of mini pc to assist you from choosing a restaurant, transferring money, Facebook, etc

  • http://www.facebook.com/sheri.harper Sheri Fresonke Harper

    I like faster and more battery

  • http://twitter.com/gizmo4me2 gizmo4me2

    Thanks for sharing

  • http://twitter.com/tomlaing Tom Laing

    I see the day coming when cell phones will be a thing of the past and electronics and functionality will be incorporated into everyday fashion e.g we’ve already got glasses and wrist watches that do it. Just wait, men’s shirt collars and lapels can’t be far away. Maxwell Smart eat your heart out.

  • http://www.facebook.com/michael.j.gabris Michael J. Gabris

    I just have to say that I thought the 9000 was amazing because of The Saint. Let’s go 920!

  • http://twitter.com/AlexEfimoff Alex Efimoff

    I feel a bit sad reading this great article. typical computers and smartphones are getting faster, more sophisticated but less productive.
    Back then we were trying to get maximum from what we had, there was excitement and a sense of great discovery, these days we have just delegated a part of our daily duties to the so called ‘smart’ devices, hence this behaviour doesn’t make us more intelligent but lazier and dependant on our branded devices and what the fashion advices.

  • http://twitter.com/PeterN901 Peter Schneider

    My first computer was an Commodore PET1000 (yes, I’m only that young anymore) and it had a tape recorder to load software into the memory. Good reminder in a world of quad-instruction, dual-core CPU world.

  • http://twitter.com/Hdrules Hdrules

    still this is not the best and the fastest from qualcomm….best one is S4 quadcore pro ;-) and there are high chances that 2nd wave of wp8 devices in Q1 of 2013 will be featuring that SoC including Lumia pureview pro with 41mp slimmer camera module hopefully!

  • http://twitter.com/carolharnett Carol Harnett

    I simply think of my smartphone as a computer that I can hold in my hand.

  • http://twitter.com/U_SAF Mohammad Yousaf

    My first computer to work on was Intel 286 running on windows 3.1 and office 97 i think..the first ever smart phone I saw was Nokia’s 3310 type model.. my first mobile was Nokia too…

  • http://www.facebook.com/derrick.leigh Derrick Leigh

    When Neil Armstrong landed on the moon I was programming an ICL 1905A mainframe. It had 32k RAM and cost £250,000. The BBC micro I bought in 1982 also had 32k RAM but was a whole lot cheaper!

  • http://www.facebook.com/william.gatesiii.3 William Gates III

    A typical optical mouse of today has several times the computing power that was used to put the man on the moon…

  • http://www.facebook.com/MarkAReynolds Mark Reynolds

    You have more computing power in your wristwatch than was used to put man on the moon. Even the Voyager spacecraft (still out there, still operating after 35 years!) had 6 computers each with a total combined memory per spacecraft equivalent to about 64 kilo-bytes of RAM. My first computer had a whopping 16 kilo-bytes of RAM. I do remember techno-lusting over the Nokia Communicator 9000!

  • prathamesh

    sadly enough though, in 2007 it was nokia who lost out on the touch screen race.
    And nokia has realised that the more the processing power the better after getting out e series one after the other with the same processor and not offering any improvement in the porcessor speed. POint in case – The E series with their ubiquitous 680 Mhz Arm processor.

  • Carlo Powe-Crawford

    Who’d a thunk it? Holding more computing power in our hand than was used to put a man on the moon? Wild.

  • http://twitter.com/tulleuchen Tulleuchen

    blows the mind. I had a Vic 20 for my first computer. A whopping 4K memory.

  • Erkki Ruohtula

    The Lumia 920 can probably emulate my first computer, an Oric-1 (6502 @ 1Mhz, 48k RAM), many times faster than it actually ran. Might make an interesting app…
    But there is one sad difference between the two: The Oric was programmable in a relatively friendly (for the time) way right after the boot on its own keyboard. One could do neat (but slow) graphics or sound demos by entering just a few lines of BASIC. To program the Lumia, one has to jump through hoops to download the suitable SDK on a PC with a suitable version of Windows, and then to get you program loaded on your own device. I heard that at least initially, you cannot even get you hands on a WP8 SDK without being an established developer.

  • http://twitter.com/strategyplanone Strategy Plan One

    But did Man really land on the moon? And if so what would have been the real processor power? — ha ha, leave that for another conspiracy blog

    Technology is truly amazing. Similar stories about the processing power of game systems.

  • Cosmic Doggerel

    i am looking forward to more innovation on smartphones in the future. it is so exciting to see what will happen on the next 10 years,

  • dondu

    j’aime et partage